Information on Result #506146

There is no (45, 161, 994)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 25 043811 961862 009092 014930 117358 068113 378868 644940 880238 499414 523348 919377 243494 240882 810934 716821 894337 407669 035168 542870 684324 582776 625093 629280 > 8161

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (45, 162, 994)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction