Information on Result #506154
There is no (61, 161, 2221)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 25 418529 371763 939807 613174 702223 433379 418783 818261 944778 353708 770118 723377 641447 321998 805597 148158 660589 934369 967995 476572 214727 770591 964003 798192 > 8161
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (61, 162, 2221)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |