Information on Result #506168
There is no (89, 161, 22286)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 25 004766 172899 801554 062107 204559 964346 402540 877726 931040 402537 547016 474586 829716 855199 190881 708889 362456 403704 203265 042261 342606 044295 326015 500280 > 8161
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (89, 162, 22286)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |