Information on Result #506172

There is no (97, 161, 63874)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 24 986367 673461 059059 538655 605169 899538 816128 030230 163967 832361 363581 596536 026759 535764 502903 228987 763733 514431 053064 080340 537732 836719 872881 103572 > 8161

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (97, 162, 63874)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction