Information on Result #506185
There is no (32, 162, 597)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 202 384697 845414 526410 387524 524272 464103 089906 527285 017447 311326 138240 642262 192249 046950 791355 688746 074874 715833 260505 142797 267324 325784 683657 432612 > 8162
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (32, 163, 597)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |