Information on Result #506192

There is no (46, 162, 1032)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 204 765027 977599 820538 677213 282895 652554 131429 858424 146389 634276 869344 024674 687867 814337 906613 840038 213839 639445 508989 468510 360392 902052 576992 718720 > 8162

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (46, 163, 1032)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction