Information on Result #506197
There is no (56, 162, 1662)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 204 319110 388367 859250 505108 031603 326357 244915 964776 127730 500859 940706 302202 864981 494931 352072 587158 392920 818897 680604 490747 215988 927063 062562 766121 > 8162
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (56, 163, 1662)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |