Information on Result #506200

There is no (62, 162, 2316)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 200 556653 072199 081563 033533 195197 975027 171060 904235 295311 483127 877428 716424 850497 648083 711630 959636 404438 487066 684305 931408 132235 418815 904029 802192 > 8162

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (62, 163, 2316)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction