Information on Result #506201
There is no (64, 162, 2612)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 203 036863 233130 927737 326455 686063 453916 375361 641310 219167 059069 179068 252730 507355 338297 788045 042209 663689 680126 312576 617380 522355 739174 044613 647093 > 8162
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (64, 163, 2612)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |