Information on Result #506221
There is no (104, 162, 184855)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 199 822877 317141 209267 901869 185211 650623 335352 025401 348700 364726 064509 969268 753021 330906 960060 608711 021277 897524 148410 817063 656915 277252 993008 876416 > 8162
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (104, 163, 184855)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |