Information on Result #506240
There is no (51, 163, 1284)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1626 556963 218401 129002 522039 284078 791466 550490 895692 011686 894100 036334 662045 247597 595069 010205 733778 972044 316139 895402 926556 401692 899215 479788 597280 > 8163
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (51, 164, 1284)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |