Information on Result #506246
There is no (63, 163, 2416)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1614 853712 870473 355727 488485 552680 676504 675036 566676 576026 338660 277343 287306 305677 250004 587861 690256 745024 701500 965137 823018 877566 697666 277018 806916 > 8163
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (63, 164, 2416)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |