Information on Result #506247
There is no (65, 163, 2726)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1608 003425 830820 921591 806916 438366 255680 881493 838878 814471 646272 788560 267675 068821 689489 487078 091562 720328 264298 221235 897231 056649 488377 333789 424056 > 8163
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (65, 164, 2726)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |