Information on Result #506248
There is no (67, 163, 3092)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1604 590832 114966 571532 761086 954083 122898 585472 159825 280964 236457 558892 328412 586809 869652 905037 436128 348201 651742 723952 238169 237355 934752 329427 254112 > 8163
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (67, 164, 3092)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |