Information on Result #506277
There is no (32, 164, 596)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 13153 389342 703100 512398 099360 790916 787138 490066 176018 091847 936232 714670 370166 315222 626752 190638 375622 567019 920969 396828 114490 925118 486503 995460 963991 > 8164
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (32, 165, 596)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |