Information on Result #506284
There is no (46, 164, 1019)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 13053 430391 639887 206096 521287 687683 261608 551654 431724 073029 228256 849128 670036 656764 800412 084523 789458 022715 967066 875943 445783 904528 354429 411656 120808 > 8164
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (46, 165, 1019)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |