Information on Result #506287
There is no (52, 164, 1334)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 13067 536883 110751 388476 922192 517508 245524 833305 635934 506182 337448 950222 219741 664254 370463 351503 324507 344680 916013 946972 272960 093866 329462 451267 816160 > 8164
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (52, 165, 1334)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |