Information on Result #506289
There is no (56, 164, 1623)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 13044 209970 586171 250136 451887 718223 883031 301813 503256 476748 676423 246129 176827 831017 246737 612358 809553 064186 071943 240834 665648 472323 506387 331283 889074 > 8164
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (56, 165, 1623)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |