Information on Result #506292
There is no (62, 164, 2242)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 12796 874061 265862 785588 845931 230848 829702 315268 369264 345870 777864 524588 611967 964797 844945 853971 417517 248043 689175 283806 667004 456566 313140 459866 535520 > 8164
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (62, 165, 2242)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |