Information on Result #506293
There is no (64, 164, 2520)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 12936 371277 330859 137760 792144 041521 669223 970356 443695 269033 446149 965233 449124 731179 835600 958055 707030 743562 969511 143200 642777 028476 512989 932310 493614 > 8164
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (64, 165, 2520)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |