Information on Result #506306

There is no (90, 164, 21049)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 12800 163597 648665 116229 537892 951283 187967 485513 927026 143741 788661 718128 539634 919562 277451 201927 896507 214098 396662 756564 990856 491482 974347 727551 212440 > 8164

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (90, 165, 21049)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction