Information on Result #506309

There is no (96, 164, 43879)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 12796 214191 649922 698001 588396 690702 304335 075543 211319 541992 870978 019568 150453 415157 200308 621764 696965 367407 315349 582236 343135 154390 073338 515569 699617 > 8164

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 165, 43879)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction