Information on Result #506314
There is no (106, 164, 213362)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 12787 049817 997380 238082 976463 214595 548436 606210 637098 578167 186313 254658 447434 302062 567430 420744 062567 405155 233075 667490 482583 421063 469133 186361 116872 > 8164
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (106, 165, 213362)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |