Information on Result #506324
There is no (33, 165, 617)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 112118 801700 003369 365979 708600 917743 713580 531778 804858 985617 511585 803551 807532 141256 052030 228459 437124 680973 217584 930927 062987 351310 325361 535018 261620 > 8165
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (33, 166, 617)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |