Information on Result #506333
There is no (51, 165, 1262)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 103866 760351 051649 374523 163688 550664 093687 925146 718067 810688 648714 713140 767399 776381 814708 322453 490142 780035 413442 782574 171352 790764 829711 975013 748028 > 8165
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (51, 166, 1262)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |