Information on Result #506336

There is no (57, 165, 1688)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 104207 648756 591951 270957 770026 480029 650743 804006 173552 037653 157126 216549 605507 471198 537629 708000 795666 225277 421487 992802 279092 339972 231163 695632 858188 > 8165

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (57, 166, 1688)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction