Information on Result #506353
There is no (91, 165, 22267)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 102367 890531 660176 661079 272360 684228 583577 952679 111699 675077 749448 646401 302985 736751 401786 109085 944635 792337 679092 255322 986192 745638 835699 846958 580636 > 8165
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (91, 166, 22267)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |