Information on Result #506354

There is no (93, 165, 28084)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 102356 233882 365455 516743 915284 081293 271114 270403 078788 555304 326824 537846 668242 475604 406638 436725 312213 896557 910747 581697 890059 231845 625277 798737 893676 > 8165

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (93, 166, 28084)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction