Information on Result #506355
There is no (95, 165, 35919)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 102294 547642 004660 272774 560126 573638 879268 651297 648028 642666 782132 421931 176700 043940 842813 551060 331196 405207 098142 246381 740876 598294 613201 925987 986760 > 8165
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (95, 166, 35919)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |