Information on Result #506356

There is no (97, 165, 46647)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 102313 571161 262187 224202 689299 410855 196125 843766 171503 450879 968467 883260 741501 254562 186128 206203 079243 493866 066559 434755 220661 122864 531475 031021 105441 > 8165

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (97, 166, 46647)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction