Information on Result #506359

There is no (103, 165, 113666)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 102297 790618 823536 439055 658531 805633 269659 723952 784054 202706 515082 853913 710105 194190 395265 070885 212428 811152 649244 908460 611361 854577 950286 523485 150720 > 8165

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (103, 166, 113666)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction