Information on Result #506370

There is no (32, 166, 595)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 841043 215851 815920 198003 113120 107997 872515 507742 297754 027216 454655 304953 884727 888073 136145 264717 555388 404214 153953 863654 325782 733411 385911 619191 492680 > 8166

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 167, 595)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction