Information on Result #506385

There is no (62, 166, 2174)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 820207 156021 995501 341216 933849 453290 606518 200603 573515 346900 067248 569719 527524 312664 909648 590021 012501 824195 356121 211720 298715 951053 903028 140679 223467 > 8166

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (62, 167, 2174)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction