Information on Result #506387

There is no (66, 166, 2741)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 823509 800505 708618 113127 364189 217860 314610 348543 221726 054521 049434 872501 187081 065507 869089 440732 551819 651820 793998 913527 554497 635723 514850 401578 484166 > 8166

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (66, 167, 2741)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction