Information on Result #506402
There is no (96, 166, 38120)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 819064 999941 677858 257087 277325 268170 439550 737267 636589 401052 905876 376365 091567 188018 894489 468421 731829 052809 702976 517491 907819 014119 820463 939663 316727 > 8166
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (96, 167, 38120)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |