Information on Result #506407
There is no (106, 166, 170900)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 818417 748310 466099 872031 008830 837591 541995 131006 478572 937202 452313 373995 490436 243124 105677 450823 075568 473825 480658 872313 990743 129653 725567 598511 024288 > 8166
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (106, 167, 170900)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |