Information on Result #506463
There is no (32, 168, 594)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 52 919413 598233 347114 340634 812646 786741 175881 460361 323965 601168 062884 532764 640618 030036 839428 851576 564950 964207 100446 736078 944242 551013 060200 853019 889340 > 8168
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (32, 169, 594)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |