Information on Result #506470
There is no (46, 168, 996)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 54 759886 362080 259520 988323 318929 955347 390511 380158 986178 049069 880367 350363 715476 620429 965601 126656 420001 975286 455871 184072 955359 963532 530582 543517 798608 > 8168
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (46, 169, 996)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |