Information on Result #506478
There is no (62, 168, 2112)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 53 622968 677132 663991 585563 736641 486845 024441 673169 182161 242911 989922 803333 233255 852947 520836 673766 672017 577947 276608 420182 492518 580938 687209 250439 743671 > 8168
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (62, 169, 2112)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |