Information on Result #506479
There is no (64, 168, 2358)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 52 798340 194864 184486 942950 835559 599088 596018 432537 338110 805397 965285 707518 979350 422720 716383 491918 172518 159012 196753 970842 753535 451693 339320 012871 748957 > 8168
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (64, 169, 2358)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |