Information on Result #506480
There is no (66, 168, 2645)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 52 579043 776583 054704 461867 592482 220690 730687 417600 556843 303016 829717 738329 224365 767103 775260 919830 945702 724478 558402 656966 101689 924304 629868 872480 528824 > 8168
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (66, 169, 2645)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |