Information on Result #506495
There is no (96, 168, 33402)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 52 407810 495354 203843 651288 913470 488211 543674 860557 578599 522258 432353 973219 568241 771365 700718 812840 998736 976446 759656 283032 332205 190177 187307 140899 417250 > 8168
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (96, 169, 33402)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |