Information on Result #506517
There is no (45, 169, 951)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 421 316082 318314 299802 862089 212338 283010 808309 330402 198096 851535 493355 745827 795465 727056 297957 780650 122872 350182 207354 362830 466146 047238 974441 387745 984592 > 8169
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (45, 170, 951)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |