Information on Result #506518
There is no (47, 169, 1032)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 441 805540 851940 094438 059014 833149 291727 937732 621466 675250 022885 972902 295858 157099 983633 752041 515264 155725 391863 577580 117841 923768 406954 895171 843544 448640 > 8169
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (47, 170, 1032)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |