Information on Result #506519

There is no (49, 169, 1121)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 420 647793 421637 597543 487565 866184 511529 308530 877488 686193 240991 535512 107547 107844 074750 549383 842248 540607 556492 523388 676601 126083 553095 517196 089897 667216 > 8169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (49, 170, 1121)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction