Information on Result #506520
There is no (51, 169, 1222)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 419 012766 777169 743098 059806 143263 302270 356334 070333 950991 879258 513672 217493 416223 984390 687533 513696 202593 344473 591198 570839 469409 187735 832242 359605 680944 > 8169
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (51, 170, 1222)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |