Information on Result #506523
There is no (57, 169, 1613)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 423 851687 754722 013595 787135 740441 454204 580198 238325 818414 538107 477883 115554 521372 190684 026418 381932 053554 118381 040282 262164 815816 230636 724704 449332 430364 > 8169
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (57, 170, 1613)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |