Information on Result #506524
There is no (59, 169, 1781)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 420 296623 889309 171177 370990 454869 334210 255733 774553 540879 433950 876917 478055 003640 670532 033066 094891 235313 401022 776306 121395 222402 584674 093894 561002 187200 > 8169
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (59, 170, 1781)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |