Information on Result #506526
There is no (63, 169, 2197)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 420 489192 940239 799907 679957 604414 616150 647037 814442 305034 862119 728685 419381 804371 619376 054923 634596 674549 418488 222625 907455 731939 238817 398497 750390 766112 > 8169
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (63, 170, 2197)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |