Information on Result #506527
There is no (65, 169, 2456)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 426 484283 049812 999417 457293 681455 825831 630012 077952 758070 954184 409838 429604 297261 862391 435248 843995 114613 186665 152482 497667 544649 550174 465311 038205 897508 > 8169
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (65, 170, 2456)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |