Information on Result #506527

There is no (65, 169, 2456)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 426 484283 049812 999417 457293 681455 825831 630012 077952 758070 954184 409838 429604 297261 862391 435248 843995 114613 186665 152482 497667 544649 550174 465311 038205 897508 > 8169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 170, 2456)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction